Most organizations preparing for DPDPA treat it as a documentation exercise. But DPDPA does not ask whether a policy exists. It asks whether consent is actually enforced when a system accesses personal data, whether a processor’s obligations are actually documented, and whether an organization can actually produce evidence when a regulator asks. Meeting that bar takes two different kinds of work done together, identity enforcement and governance, and most organizations only have one of the two in place.

This whitepaper lays out how NuSummit closes both gaps under a single engagement model.

With this whitepaper, you can:

• See how runtime consent enforcement at the point of data access closes the gap between consent that is captured and consent that is actually enforced.
• Understand Purpose-Based Access Control and why role-based access alone cannot meet DPDPA’s purpose limitation requirement.
• Get the complete DPDPA-to-control mapping, obligation by obligation, showing exactly which IAM control or advisory service covers each section of the Act.
• See the six-level DPDPA compliance maturity model and get a sense of where your organization likely sits today.
• Review four real engagements, including a 70% reduction in Data Subject Access Request turnaround time and 300+ vendor risk assessments completed annually for a global financial group.

Download the whitepaper to see the complete engagement model, from initiation through ongoing managed compliance.